I want to explore a bit in this article how it’s possible, desirable, and even necessary to cherish others despite the fact that they, like us, don’t exist from their own side. Why cherish illusory people?! Lemme lead up to that …
I’ve been thinking about Venerable Atisha quite a lot lately, how inspirational a role model he is. He starts his Advice from Atisha’s Heart with genuine humility – what he says here is not tongue in cheek, he actually means it!
Friends, since you already have great knowledge and clear understanding, whereas I am nof no importance and have little wisdom, it is not suitable for you to request advice from me. However, because you dear friends, whom I cherish from my heart, have requested me, I shall give you this essential advice from my inferior and childish mind.
And then he goes on to, presumably, blow his friends away with the most heart-warming and profound daily advice you can imagine, advice that has resonated down the ages. It is one of my main go-to’s if I feel the need to re-arrange my thoughts. Only yesterday, for example, I sat on this bench in my new nearby park and, after connecting for a few minutes with my Buddha nature to get things moving (as explained in this article called Heartspace), I contemplated Atisha’s words. Within minutes, my whole day had turned around. Highly recommended, lol, next time you’re in a bad mood, or if you just want to feel extra good. Like any great master whose words drip with blessings, Atisha is able to inspire us, rather than cajole or force us, into a vastly improved mindset with relatively little effort on our part. 
On the subject of re-arranging our thoughts compared with seeking relief from outside of ourselves, I was talking to a relatively new practitioner yesterday for whom, not so long ago, the idea of a Sunday morning treat was to have coffee in bed and scroll social media for 3 hours. She knew she felt no better, and indeed pretty wasted, by the end of it; but isn’t that just what we all do these days?! Having met Dharma, she decided one Sunday to instead drink her coffee while cherishing and playing with her dogs, followed by Sunday morning meditation class. She has never looked back. I was reminded of that dedication verse in Essence of Good Fortune:
The Buddhadharma is the supreme medicine
That relieves all mental pain.
It works every time (if we take it).
Exchanging self with others
Atisha’s humility is part of his exchanging himself with others, wherein he genuinely believed that he was no more important than others, that indeed they were more important than him. The times I’ve managed it, I find it immensely relaxing to no longer have to feed my self-importance, but to believe instead that I am insignificant, at most a mere cell in the vast body of life, no more important than any other cell. Truth is, far less important, as I am just one cell and others are many. (More here: Better together.)
And if we do really understand that the self we normally see, and believe is so important, does not in fact exist, we finally have that permission to give up on cherishing it once and for all. There is just no point to it. Self-cherishing is self-defeating. We don’t need to hold out for it, thinking, “I need to keep a little bit of selfishness back, surely, or people will walk all over me and I won’t be able to have fun.” They won’t and we will.
Thanks to Buddha’s and Atisha’s mind-training teachings, we learn that we have the permission to be as kind and loving as we want, to as many people as we want – the more, the merrier. Our whole life can be dedicated to making others happy and relieving their pain, both on a day to day hands-on local level and with a huge heart seeking enlightenment to free all living beings. Just like Atisha. And we’ll discover that this is the quick path to fulfilling all our own wishes as well. As Venerable Geshe Kelsang said in his teachings on The Heart Sutra in Portugal 2013:
All the Buddhas of the past and present changed the object of their cherishing from themselves to all other living beings. As a result of this, they attained the supreme happiness of enlightenment and have the ability to benefit each and every living being every day by giving blessings and by emanating various kinds of things for the purpose of living beings.
He suggests we can “follow their example”. I find it helpful to contemplate individual examples, such as Atisha, Venerable Geshe-la, Arya Tara, Khachen Yeshe Gyaltsan, or Buddha himself. There are numerous examples to choose from on any given day. Right now, like I said, I am into Atisha. He was a seriously awesome practitioner and yet believed we could all, of course, be just as good as him. He is also the original founder of our Kadampa tradition. You can read his life story in Joyful Path of Good Fortune.
Why bother cherishing people if they’re illusory, though?
However, this brings me to a common question that comes up, which I also saw on Facebook yesterday. One wise peer posed the question. and then other wise peers gave some great answers. I hope they don’t mind if I simply (and lazily) copy and paste their words here (slightly edited in places for brevity).
Gen Pagpa brings up a quote, saying that in the meditation on cherishing all living beings in The Mirror of Dharma with Additions, Geshe-la says:
We believe that ourself we normally see is so important and its happiness and freedom are most important, and we neglect the happiness and freedom of others. This belief is ignorance, because ourself that we normally see does not actually exist. If we search for ourself that we normally see with wisdom, it will disappear. This proves that it does not exist at all. Therefore, our normal view believing that ourself is important but others are not is ignorance of self-cherishing.
And then he poses the question:
If the self that we normally see doesn’t exist, then neither does the self of others that we normally see; so how can others be more important than ourself? Surely we are all equally unimportant creations of self-grasping!? Conversely, if others are important, then surely this means that we are important because we perceive self and other to exist in the same way. Why would this not be the case?
I won’t write everybody’s names but you can find the actual conversation on a Facebook group called: Discussing Geshe Kelsang Gyatso’s Books.
Person 1: The belief that we are more important than others is ignorant for several reasons and not “only” because the self that we normally see does not exist, but also because others have shown us great kindness, have the exact same wish for happiness as us, and are far more numerous than us.
And the fact that they don’t exist in the way that we perceive them to exist doesn’t mean that they don’t exist at all. We are important in the sense that our happiness is important, but our happiness is best served by regarding others as more important than ourself.
Person 2: Others are important because, although they do not exist inherently, we need them to progress and develop the minds we need to attain realizations along the path to enlightenment for the benefit of all. It is more beneficial to cherish them as we cannot do this without them.
Person 3: Cherishing others is a correct belief that leads to happiness. Self-cherishing is an incorrect belief that leads to suffering. Neither reality exists inherently, but which reality would you like to abide in? When we cherish others and diminish our own delusions, our mind is suffering less. When we cherish others, our mind becomes closer to being able to experience reality as it truly exists. Those are some of my favorites.
Person 4: I would say that the self we normally see does not exist, so therefore it is unimportant and there is no point cherishing it. But there is a self that does exist, our Buddha nature, our pure potential. We should absolutely cherish that. Cherishing our Buddha nature is renunciation.
The others we normally see also do not exist, and therefore are also unimportant. There is no point cherishing them either.* They are the creations of our delusions.
But there are still others that do exist, their Buddha nature, their pure potential. We should absolutely cherish that. Cherishing others’ Buddha nature is universal love, compassion, and bodhichitta. The others that appear to these minds do exist and are creations of our wisdom and other virtuous minds.
*Me again: I would just add to this point that it takes a while to hold the view that can cherish others while simultaneously realizing they lack inherent existence. And therefore there is some point in cherishing others whom we view as real — this is an important, indeed probably essential, step in the right direction. Person 4 person did qualify this point himself, “Cherishing others is grounded more in conventional wisdom and, frankly, math, and will lead us in the direction of ultimate wisdom minds while also helping us to create better karma for ourselves. So even if they don’t exist, cherishing them is better than cherishing our self that doesn’t exist.”
Also, this is an important point:
Person 5: My answer to this point would be, although we may still see other living beings as inherently existent, the mind of love itself is not a self-grasping mind and so it observes existent living beings and develops the wish for them to be happy – thus, love is a valid mind, a virtuous mind that is a main cause of happiness. Self-cherishing, on the other hand, is part of ignorance and the self that it cherishes doesn’t exist; it’s a delusion, and, being a delusion, leads to suffering.
I like this one:
Person 6: If 100 people are hallucinating a real frightening tiger, why are 99 of them more important than 1 when there is no tiger? It because they are all believing that there is a real tiger and this is very important to resolve. Just because there is no tiger doesn’t mean everything is ok.
Me again: One final consideration that I find helpful is that I know full well, in my own experience, how much I want to be happy and free from suffering, even though I don’t exist in the way that I appear. So I can know that this applies to everyone else, too. 
Thank you to these unwitting contributors! I think this just about covers it, and hope it’s not too head-scratching. If you have any questions about any of this or would like to add more observations in the comments below, that’ll be awesome.
Atisha’s cook
And now, to conclude on a practical note, back to Atisha … Atisha is famous for tolerating, nay deeply appreciating, his grumpy cook. Who doesn’t have one of those in their lives? And generally we want them to show us some respect or, failing that, go away and be replaced by people who are nice to us. His disciples wanted to get rid of him but he was having none of it:
Without this man, there would be no one with whom I could practice patience. He is very kind to me. I need him! ~ The New Eight Steps to Happiness
He genuinely appreciated having someone around who could keep him “real”, as it were –helping him practice exchanging self with others, humility, self-awareness, and unconditional love. Like the grit in the oyster, necessary if we are to have a pearl, we need difficult people in our lives if we desire mental strength. How else can we make progress with universal love and compassion, and in particular with patience? I mean the occasional day or week or month without an Atisha’s cook
around can be really relaxing, lol, but where is the challenge if everyone is always nice to us?! I want to get to the point when, like Atisha, I am just as affectionate and relaxed around the difficult people in my life as I am around those who praise and validate me. That spells freedom.
It’s a work in progress. Over to you … feel free to cherish me by leaving a comment 😁

12 Comments
This article beautifully captures the essence of cherishing others and recognizing the interconnectedness of all beings. Embracing the illusion reminds me of how much lighter life can feel when we step beyond self-centered perspectives. Thank you for this insightful reflection on kindness and compassion.
Regards,
Antique Buddhas
https://www.buddha-statues.co.uk
Thank you for your comment 🙂
I checked out your website — that is an impressive array of Buddhas! One tiny suggestion, which you are of course free to ignore, is to not have any of them just placed straight on the floor but have them at least somewhat elevated.
And I know they are for sale, but it might be nice while you have them to put some flowers or some other offerings in front of them? That will also encourage whoever buys them to do the same. It is traditional and auspicious and good karma always to have offerings in front of Buddhas, and not such great karma not to.
Blessings Luna, I so appreciate your articles. They’re a bridge to Kadampa Buddhism for me. And when times are not so good I’m reminded that a simple wish for others to be happy is exactly the medicine I need 😉 And this is something I can do when everything else feels out of my control. Thank you x🙏x
Thank you so much for your kind comment, Vanessa, I’m really glad the articles help 🙂 Isn’t it so true that we can cherish ourselves out of our own problems even, especially!, when times are hard?! xxx
Thank you for sharing this thoughtful post. I appreciate the perspective that cherishing others helps dissolve the illusion of self-centeredness and fosters a deeper connection with the world. It reminds me that by focusing on others’ happiness, we step closer to our own inner peace. The analogy of life as an illusion makes this approach even more powerful—helping us see beyond our immediate attachments and desires. A truly inspiring read!
Regards,
Antique Buddhas
https://www.nepal-tibet-buddhas.com
I love this comment! Thank you so much.
And I will check out your website.
Namo Buddhaya!
Hello Luna. I haven’t commented on any of your recent posts, altho I do so enjoy your creative wit and inspiring words.
After many years – 10 ½ in fact. I am ready to delve more deeply into my spirituality. I attempted 3 times over those years to move to a Buddhist community, but “the Master didn’t arrive because the student wasn’t ready”.
I am now recently divorced and have been led to join an Ashram in India .. I’m still awaiting acceptance at this time, but I feel I am finally ready to be a student, at age 55!
My point is, during the tumultuous times last year I read Nisargadatta Maharaj’s book “I Am” and I’d like to quote something that is actually a little bit relevant to your topic. (Please correct me if I’m wrong 😇)
“That which you are, your True Self, you love it, and whatever you do, you do for your own happiness. To find it, to know it, to cherish it, is your basic urge. Since time immemorial you loved yourself but never wisely.
Use your body and mind wisely in the service of the Self, that is all. Be true to your own Self, love your Self absolutely. Do not pretend that you love others as yourself. Unless you have realized them as one with your Self, you cannot love them. Don’t pretend to be what you are not, don’t refuse to be what you are.
Your love of others is the result of self-knowledge, not its cause.
Without self-realization, no virtue is genuine. When you know beyond all doubting that the same life flows through all that is, and you are that life, you will love all naturally and spontaneously.
When you realize the depth and fullness of your Love of yourself, you know that every living being and the entire universe are included in your affection.
But when you look at anything as separate from you, you cannot love it for you are afraid of it. Alienation causes fear and fear deepens alienation. It is a vicious circle. Only Self-realization can break it. Go for it resolutely.”
So this hit home for me, as I realized I was deluded in thinking that practicing Buddhism and showing kindness to my family would stop the alienation I feel around them. At the end of it (all those years practicing kindness and compassion and being the best most willing person) I felt like a cracked and broken martyr. I had to actually leave to continue on my spiritual journey towards enlightenment. It has always been my deepest yearning. They knew it but kept me bound up to their judgements and hurt me in so many ways.
So, while I know the theory behind the illusion of my Self, I have decided to pledge love to my own Self and pursue enlightenment .. it is my Definite Chief Aim in Life!
ThanQ for the wonderful post that inspired me to share this with others.
I think we should all make sure that when we are pursuing the Path we either are alone or living in a community with like-minded individuals.
ThanQ again Luna. 🤗💟
It does help!
Have you read the 8th chapter of the commentary to Shantideva’s Guide to the Bodhisattva’s Way of Life in Meaningful to Behold? I think you’d enjoy it.
Thank you for your lovely comment x
🤔 In A Simple Way I’m Here Because Of Geshe-la Modern And Pure Teachings Presentation Of Buddha 👌📿🙏💙💚
I have never posted here. Only just found the site, perusing it.
Also, for reference, I do not claim to be buddhist, at least not explicitly. Which isn’t to say that I don’t study buddhism, but rather, that I also study other things. I may wax heretical, as I don’t particularly ascribe to a single particular school of thought. Well, I do… but I can’t point to the name of the tradition in any book, I just take it straight from my mentor, whom does not have her feet on ground.
Anyway, I actually like this response, more than the other responses (though I don’t mean that to imply any criticism of the others, they are all well worth reading). Your description of your time trying to be positive with your family hit home for me as well. There is a distinct difference between forcing oneself to be compassionate, and having true compassion. And I think the former is harmful to oneself, and in subtle ways harmful to others as well.
That last bit relates to karma. My view of karma is a bit uh, not entirely commonplace. It comes from a less well known tibetian daoist sect’s take on the idea. That karma is not a mystical enforcement of ‘fairness’ in the universe, nor the result of intention. But rather, that whenever one acts (or even dwells mentally) in discord with their true self and true will (highest self), that one is harmed by this, right then and there, in that moment. That it lessens the “them-ness of them”, and distances them from true self. And worse, can create psychological monsters in the closet, which chase them away from facing their true nature. Meanwhile acting in harmony with one’s true self, one moves closer to enlightenment and realization of true self. I don’t think this version of karma even particularly requires any religious belief. It could be regarded religiously or secularly, it works either way. That a form of fairness can precipitate from this, isn’t really the main point, it’s more like a side effect of the main point. Though I can understand why some would grasp onto the ‘fairness’ aspect.
Anyway, if you ‘try’ to be nice… you’re not in harmony with your true will and higher self. And if that encourages others to be cruel (through kind of reverse psychology and bullying dynamics), then it draws them away from their higher selves as well. Which I could go very deep into and create a whole essay on the “cruelty of pacifism”… but not right now maybe 🙂
Which isn’t to say it is better to lash out in retaliation. At least not as a blunt impulse. But… both you, and those being cruel to you, deserve better. And it is not a mean thing to put your foot down and insist. It stopped being a matter of their sovereign free will when they involved another.
There is more than one spoke on the wheel, leading to the center. And there is no ‘best’ spoke, only more and less obvious routes to the center *from where you are*. Focusing inward is absolutely valid. After a situation not horribly different than yours, for a long stretch of my path I was not really focused on compassion to others. Not that I was dispassionate or unkind, just that it wasn’t a central focus, spiritually. I guess I viewed it more like I wasn’t in a position to try to save anyone else from drowning while I was drowning myself. I questioned whether I had the wisdom to be ‘truly’ helpful anyway, until I understood a great deal more.
Also, I think whether you are moved by chasing a butterfly, or by bumping into a thorn bush, is irrelevant. It’s a question of whether it moved you forward or not. I’d welcome a thousand thorns if they helped me move forward. Not that I’m any masochist, nor ascetic. I’d kinda rather butterflies, but whatever works. Forward momentum on my path matters more than comfort. And in the grand synchronicity of things, to discern what is truly betterment or harm is not casually obvious.
So don’t fret over being 55 or having a bumpy road behind you. It would be extraordinarily difficult to say whether there is any actual hinderance in that. There are things I had to learn, or unlearn, which may have been easily obvious to the next person. And took up time & effort, where another might have breezed right through. And things I breezed through, which might’ve been a struggle for others. To some extent, experience and maturity has value, even outside of an intentional enlightenment focused path. There may be a few, uh… ‘concepts’ which you can kinda breeze through, which you might not have 20 years ago. I guess put another way, class can be in session before you even realize you’re enrolled. And at some point, long ago, there wasn’t even a class, merely the exploration of a lone soul.
But yeah, I can absolutely vouch for the idea that becoming more completely aware of the entirety of self (which I think ‘requires’ no small amount of compassion for self), will definitely reach a “branching out” stage. When you start to see the translucence of the division between things in the universe (especially between facets of universal consciousness, but material as well). It makes other people seem a lot more ‘personal’.
Never once did my mentor push in the direction of focusing on others. And not that I’m entirely out of the water now. It’s just, I can feel the bottom under my feet, so it finally makes “some” sense to think about trying to be helpful. And looking back, I don’t get the impression that well intentioned flailing about in the water would have really done a whole lot to help anyone. I mean, if you were trying to help someone out of the water, would you want them to let go and grab another drowning person? Or climb out so they can help properly? I get good intentions and all, but pragmatism has it’s place too 🙂
…just, everybody’s drowning, so be nice , and a whole lot of people are going to sink to the bottom in this lifetime, so I think it’s always fair to infect reality with more mirth than it has a reasonable claim to. Kinda like the Make a Wish thing, except your mirth budget is technically limitless, so feel free to go ham. Though people have sovereign wills of their own, and it’s not nice to ‘force’ anything, even mirth. And samsara has to have it’s unpleasantness, for people to feel the urgency for something better.
Also, I don’t necessarily think that enlightenment is “better” in an absolute sense. It is better “for me”, and I think for many others. But there is no arbitrary ruling on value saying which path through existence is greatest, or least. It is very important to me. But that doesn’t make me the arbiter of what life is worth living. I just have an insatiable thirst for knowledge and understanding, and I don’t fancy a hard-drive-wipe. I’m not even very focused on the ‘suffering’ angle (one of the areas I kinda don’t seem very buddhist). Sure, there is suffering, but I’m a little more ‘aspirational’ and a little less ‘suffering refuge’.
Here’s a thing too.. about beliefs. Beliefs which have built-in uh.. ‘spreading genetics’ will be far more common. However the uh.. “contagion-level” of a paradigm does not have any relationship with it’s validity or truth. So “help everybody, always” will end up being a far more common viewpoint, whether it is objectively optimal, or not. Because it’s a self-spreading idea. ‘I was taught to help everyone always, so i teach people to help everyone always, and I’m always helping people always, and teaching them that’… that’s a self-perpetuating cycle, which makes it disproportionately common as a held belief. In a manner which is apart from implicit wisdom. It may be wise, but you can’t gauge that based on it’s popularity as an idea. Personally I’d advocate for getting yourself to a place, where you are more capable and confident of being outwardly focused in a manner which is meaningfully relevant, and where it is a sincere reflection of your current relationship with your true will. Just try not to kick anybody in the meantime, unless they really need it (and the phrasing of that last bit is rather precisely chosen).
Mostly, I just get the impression that you seem focused on what is true, apart from what is ‘outwardly admirable’ seeming, or even in spite of it if need be. And I just really identify with that. That was really the foundational prerequisite mindset for my own path. A rigorous purge of untruths, and especially the ‘feel-good’ ones. Those were way too suspect. I didn’t even realize it was the start of an enlightenment path at that point, I was just fed up with delusion from within and dogma from without. And my mentor did not spare even a glance for me until I was at that point. And she taught me more than half of everything I know, so it’s only further ingrained 😉
It just strikes me as fertile ground on which to cultivate.
I mean, when I first met my mentor (in a lucid dream) I was just completely and totally “done” with all the flowery platitudes and such… I was in full hard-core ‘purging of nonsense’ mode. I’d have gone hard atheist but for some first hand experiences. And then she appeared in my dream, looking all splendiferous and deific, you know that ‘500 tones of glamor’ vibe? like you get a kneejerk reflex to go slack jawed or bow your head? That. But I wasn’t having it. My very first words to her were “Not interested, so ‘bleep’ off”. But she just smiled and said “no”, and we lived happily ever after.
Oh hey, have a free “Merf!” (It’s mirth really, just sounds more fun if you say ‘merf!’ when you open it). It’s situationally agnostic, so you can open it wherever, whenever, even while being eaten by a shark. Though admittedly that would probably be pretty distracting. And very few people actually get eaten by a shark. So it would be completely understandable you wanted to be ‘in the moment’ for the shark thing. See, you’re already smiling and you haven’t even opened it yet, it’s not some cheap dime-store merf.
PS, i went ahead and signed up. I should really brush up on my buddhism. And I like the articles here.
Aw, that’s really good to hear. Thank you for your comments so far, as well!